Difference between revisions of "Talk:Music Stores"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
the point was that when you "correct" (egotistical choice of word) something with three different formats in the same article you look like a bit of a fool. the suggestion is to just step back and stick to the basics rather than specific formatting conventions which, like you've said, will never be universal anyway. | the point was that when you "correct" (egotistical choice of word) something with three different formats in the same article you look like a bit of a fool. the suggestion is to just step back and stick to the basics rather than specific formatting conventions which, like you've said, will never be universal anyway. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | curious what this flurry of "stubbing" is. why only those four articles? also, does stubbing imply the article needs to be expanded? I would think these brief articles are pretty much sufficient. | ||
Revision as of 12:09, 23 May 2006
be consistent Dan. if you're going to insist on a certain format for shop/venue names apply it to all the articles and to all the insatnces of that name in the article. and make it the same format; the other day you were italicising (Revert- albiet sporadically), now it's bold.
I spend ages correcting so many things, and everything around here seems to be done differently by different people. If you don't like it, change it. it's a wiki. --Danduran 04:38, 16 April 2006 (BST)
the point was that when you "correct" (egotistical choice of word) something with three different formats in the same article you look like a bit of a fool. the suggestion is to just step back and stick to the basics rather than specific formatting conventions which, like you've said, will never be universal anyway.
curious what this flurry of "stubbing" is. why only those four articles? also, does stubbing imply the article needs to be expanded? I would think these brief articles are pretty much sufficient.
