Difference between revisions of "Talk:Waters"
m (3 revision(s)) |
Te Irirangi (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
hey Geoff - I totally agree. Ive tried to tone the article down, but feel free to do more editing yourself. If possible, can you email me (or PM me on htown?)? | hey Geoff - I totally agree. Ive tried to tone the article down, but feel free to do more editing yourself. If possible, can you email me (or PM me on htown?)? | ||
-thedugganaut | -thedugganaut | ||
| + | |||
| + | hey both of you... totally agree with the criticism of the original article and cheers for the tidy up thur dugga. With this wiki meeting less-than-encyclopaedic standards, and also me having personal connection to most people involved in my entries I haven't always been entirely objective. Succinction just doesn't come natural, sorry. If it's all good I'll just carry on pouring out my sporadic input in the interests of sharing what I know, and leave it to others to tidy it up... ha, typical... --[[User:Te Irirangi|Te Irirangi]] 04:24, 26 September 2007 (NZST) | ||
Revision as of 05:24, 26 September 2007
Woah!! Do we need all the "got burnt by music industry parasites" narrative on here? if it's integral, can't it be a bit more objectively written? - geoff
hey Geoff - I totally agree. Ive tried to tone the article down, but feel free to do more editing yourself. If possible, can you email me (or PM me on htown?)? -thedugganaut
hey both of you... totally agree with the criticism of the original article and cheers for the tidy up thur dugga. With this wiki meeting less-than-encyclopaedic standards, and also me having personal connection to most people involved in my entries I haven't always been entirely objective. Succinction just doesn't come natural, sorry. If it's all good I'll just carry on pouring out my sporadic input in the interests of sharing what I know, and leave it to others to tidy it up... ha, typical... --Te Irirangi 04:24, 26 September 2007 (NZST)
