Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stan Jagger"
From HtownWiki
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This isn't Wikipedia... I don't think there is any harm in a little bit of flippant facetiousness... I'm reverting the page - feel free to remove it again if it really botheres you, but generally speaking, it's considered poor form to edit (presumably) biographical or auto-biographical opinion pieces on Wikis, so I think that it should stay, given its tone. --[[User:GianPerrone|GianPerrone]] 05:28, 13 May 2006 (BST) | This isn't Wikipedia... I don't think there is any harm in a little bit of flippant facetiousness... I'm reverting the page - feel free to remove it again if it really botheres you, but generally speaking, it's considered poor form to edit (presumably) biographical or auto-biographical opinion pieces on Wikis, so I think that it should stay, given its tone. --[[User:GianPerrone|GianPerrone]] 05:28, 13 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There you go. It's not non-biased and keeps what Gian suggested. --[[User:Danduran|Danduran]] 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST) | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 13 May 2006
"It is widely known that Stan Jagger is the best guitarist in Hamilton." Well, this is either true or false, but it's not 'bias'.
This isn't Wikipedia... I don't think there is any harm in a little bit of flippant facetiousness... I'm reverting the page - feel free to remove it again if it really botheres you, but generally speaking, it's considered poor form to edit (presumably) biographical or auto-biographical opinion pieces on Wikis, so I think that it should stay, given its tone. --GianPerrone 05:28, 13 May 2006 (BST)
There you go. It's not non-biased and keeps what Gian suggested. --Danduran 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST)
