Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Generator"
m (3 revision(s)) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Someone must be able to post an update on what is happening with the frequency. Anyone? [[User: Waiheke Vice|Waiheke Vice]] 20 August 2006 | Someone must be able to post an update on what is happening with the frequency. Anyone? [[User: Waiheke Vice|Waiheke Vice]] 20 August 2006 | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Mrsat]]: please do not revert pages that have been edited for content that should not be in a wiki (e.g., self promotion), or revert text where it has been corrected for formatting, style, typos etc (i.e., where you are reintroducing old mistakes). --[[User:Thedugganaut|Thedugganaut]] 14:24, 25 September 2009 (NZST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Do we need the paragraph starting "In 2003..."? It is all a little political, and a lot of writing for something that didnt come to anything. Maybe if/when Contact gets the frequency back the whole saga will make an interesting article on a separate page? Opinions? (Nick?) --[[User:Thedugganaut|Thedugganaut]] 14:33, 25 September 2009 (NZST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yeah I agree. I'm sure it could be easily summarised in a few sentences without the detailed politicised debate. --[[User:Nick]] 14:41, 25 September 2009 (NZST) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:58, 25 September 2009
Okay, so this isn't exhaustive or definitive at all, just a quick ramble (written while at work) to get something started, feel free to be unmerciful with it. There's plenty more to add I'm sure. Someone with knowledge of the last couple of years should add shit too. --Danduran 01:58, 15 April 2006 (BST)
Come on. Someone must have stuff to add here! Don't make ME write it all...
Someone must be able to post an update on what is happening with the frequency. Anyone? Waiheke Vice 20 August 2006
Mrsat: please do not revert pages that have been edited for content that should not be in a wiki (e.g., self promotion), or revert text where it has been corrected for formatting, style, typos etc (i.e., where you are reintroducing old mistakes). --Thedugganaut 14:24, 25 September 2009 (NZST)
Do we need the paragraph starting "In 2003..."? It is all a little political, and a lot of writing for something that didnt come to anything. Maybe if/when Contact gets the frequency back the whole saga will make an interesting article on a separate page? Opinions? (Nick?) --Thedugganaut 14:33, 25 September 2009 (NZST)
Yeah I agree. I'm sure it could be easily summarised in a few sentences without the detailed politicised debate. --User:Nick 14:41, 25 September 2009 (NZST)
