Difference between revisions of "Talk:Stan Jagger"
From HtownWiki
Thedugganaut (Talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by 37.139.53.10 (talk) to last revision by WikiSysop) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"It is widely known that Stan Jagger is the best guitarist in Hamilton." Well, this is either true or false, but it's not 'bias'. | "It is widely known that Stan Jagger is the best guitarist in Hamilton." Well, this is either true or false, but it's not 'bias'. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This isn't Wikipedia... I don't think there is any harm in a little bit of flippant facetiousness... I'm reverting the page - feel free to remove it again if it really botheres you, but generally speaking, it's considered poor form to edit (presumably) biographical or auto-biographical opinion pieces on Wikis, so I think that it should stay, given its tone. --[[User:GianPerrone|GianPerrone]] 05:28, 13 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There you go. It's not non-biased and keeps what Gian suggested. --[[User:Danduran|Danduran]] 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whoops, I mean it's not biased. --[[User:Danduran|Danduran]] 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:30, 4 September 2022
"It is widely known that Stan Jagger is the best guitarist in Hamilton." Well, this is either true or false, but it's not 'bias'.
This isn't Wikipedia... I don't think there is any harm in a little bit of flippant facetiousness... I'm reverting the page - feel free to remove it again if it really botheres you, but generally speaking, it's considered poor form to edit (presumably) biographical or auto-biographical opinion pieces on Wikis, so I think that it should stay, given its tone. --GianPerrone 05:28, 13 May 2006 (BST)
There you go. It's not non-biased and keeps what Gian suggested. --Danduran 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST)
Whoops, I mean it's not biased. --Danduran 06:22, 13 May 2006 (BST)
