Talk:Backbeat
Neutrality?[edit]
There seems to be updates from Backbeat FM itself that use the wiki for self promotion. The formatting of the writing needs to be revised at least. I tried to take key points from the September update, but it has since been reverted.
Speculation about the future of the frequency seems unnecessary as well, from any perspective. Hence I also removed older speculation from the Generator page about 'what would happen if the company went into liquidation'.
We need to decide on what information should be added and what is not actually noteworthy. A Backbeat update on here is much needed, so it's good that the information has been contributed, but the formatting seriously needs a look at. Maybe it'd be best for Thedugganaut to review the page. --User:Nick 13:41, 25 September 2009 (NZST)
Thanks Nick. I totally agree with you... I will edit them at some stage, and add explanations for the edits in the discussion pages. If they continue to be reverted after that we can deal with it in different ways. Having said that, if you want to revert them and provide explanations yourself, go for it. I spend far more time fixing this than i should! --Thedugganaut 14:06, 25 September 2009 (NZST)
Actually, I see you (Nick) already gave valid summaries for editing them previously. Mrsat: please do not revert pages that have been edited for content that should not be in a wiki (e.g., self promotion), or revert text where it has been corrected for formatting, style, typos etc (i.e., where you are reintroducing old mistakes). --Thedugganaut 14:24, 25 September 2009 (NZST)